İsa eleştirisi

İsa, MS birinci yüzyılda Ferisiler ve Katipler tarafından Musa'nın kanunlarına uymadığı için eleştirildi. İsa, Yahudilikte başarısız bir Mesih iddiacısı olarak tanındığını için pek çok Yahudi mezhebi tarafından sahte bir peygamber olarak kınandı. Aynı zamanda Yahudilik, herhangi bir kişiye tapınmayı da putperestliğin bir türü olarak kabul eder ve İsa'nın kutsal birisi olduğunu reddeder^[1]^[2]. Bazı psikiyatristler, dindar araştırmacılar ve yazarlar; İsa'nın ailesinin, takipçilerinin^[3] ve çağdaşlarının İsa'nın delüzyonlar, posesyonlar geçirdiğine yahut delirdiğine inandığını aktarmaktadır^[4]^[5]^[6]^[7]^[8].

Hristiyanlığa dair erken eleştirilerde 2. Yüzyıldan Celsus'un ve 3. Yüzyıldan Porfirios'un yazdığı reddiyeler bulunmaktadır^[9]^[10]. 19. Yüzyılda ise Friedrich Nietzsche; İsa'yı "fıtrata uygun olmayan" bir biçimde vaazlar vermesini, cinselliği yasaklaması gibi, şiddetli bir biçimde eleştirdi. Ayn Rand, Hector Avalos, Sita Ram Goel, Christopher Hitchens, Bertrand Russell ve Dayananda Saraswati gibi çağdaş düşünürler de onu dikkate değer bir biçimde eleştirdi.

Kaynakça değiştir

^ Kaplan, Aryeh (1985). The real Messiah? a Jewish response to missionaries (New ed.). New York: National Conference of Synagogue Youth.
^ Singer, Tovia (2010). Let's Get Biblical. RNBN Publishers; 2nd edition (2010).
^ John 7:20
^ Havis, Don (April–June 2001). "An Inquiry into the Mental Health of Jesus: Was He Crazy?". Secular Nation. Minneapolis: Atheist Alliance Inc. ISSN 1530-308X. Retrieved March 29, 2020.
^ Murray, Evan D.; Cunningham, Miles G.; Price, Bruce H. (October 2012). "The Role of Psychotic Disorders in Religious History Considered". Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 24 (4). American Psychiatric Association: 410–426.
^ Meggitt, Justin J. (June 1, 2007). "The Madness of King Jesus: Why was Jesus Put to Death, but his Followers not?". Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 29 (4). London: SAGE Publications: 379–413.
^ Hirsch, William (1912). Religion and Civilization: The Conclusions of a Psychiatrist. New York: The Truth Seeker Company. p. 135. LCCN 12002696. OCLC 39864035. OL 20516240M. That the other members of his own family considered him insane, is said quite plainly, for the openly declare, "He is beside himself."
^ Kasmar, Gene (1995). All the obscenities in the Bible. Brooklyn Center, MN: Kas-mark Pub. Co. p. 157. ISBN 978-0-9645-9950-5. He was thought to be insane by his own family and neighbors in 'when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him: for they said, He is beside himself [...] (Mark 3:21–22 – The Greek existemi translated beside himself, actually means insane and witless), The Greek word ho para translated friends, also means family.
^ Chadwick, Henry, ed. (1980). Contra Celsum. Cambridge University Press. p. xxviii. ISBN 978-0-521-29576-5.
^ Stevenson, J. (1987). Frend, W. H. C. (ed.). A New Eusebius: Documents illustrating the history of the Church to AD 337. SPCK. p. 257. ISBN 978-0-281-04268-5.

[1] Kaplan, Aryeh (1985). The real Messiah? a Jewish response to missionaries (New ed.). New York: National Conference of Synagogue Youth.

[2] Singer, Tovia (2010). Let's Get Biblical. RNBN Publishers; 2nd edition (2010).

[3] John 7:20

[4] Havis, Don (April–June 2001). "An Inquiry into the Mental Health of Jesus: Was He Crazy?". Secular Nation. Minneapolis: Atheist Alliance Inc. ISSN 1530-308X. Retrieved March 29, 2020.

[5] Murray, Evan D.; Cunningham, Miles G.; Price, Bruce H. (October 2012). "The Role of Psychotic Disorders in Religious History Considered". Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 24 (4). American Psychiatric Association: 410–426.

[6] Meggitt, Justin J. (June 1, 2007). "The Madness of King Jesus: Why was Jesus Put to Death, but his Followers not?". Journal for the Study of the New Testament. 29 (4). London: SAGE Publications: 379–413.

[7] Hirsch, William (1912). Religion and Civilization: The Conclusions of a Psychiatrist. New York: The Truth Seeker Company. p. 135. LCCN 12002696. OCLC 39864035. OL 20516240M. That the other members of his own family considered him insane, is said quite plainly, for the openly declare, "He is beside himself."

[8] Kasmar, Gene (1995). All the obscenities in the Bible. Brooklyn Center, MN: Kas-mark Pub. Co. p. 157. ISBN 978-0-9645-9950-5. He was thought to be insane by his own family and neighbors in 'when his friends heard of it, they went out to lay hold on him: for they said, He is beside himself [...] (Mark 3:21–22 – The Greek existemi translated beside himself, actually means insane and witless), The Greek word ho para translated friends, also means family.

[9] Chadwick, Henry, ed. (1980). Contra Celsum. Cambridge University Press. p. xxviii. ISBN 978-0-521-29576-5.

[10] Stevenson, J. (1987). Frend, W. H. C. (ed.). A New Eusebius: Documents illustrating the history of the Church to AD 337. SPCK. p. 257. ISBN 978-0-281-04268-5.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]