Vikipedi tartışma:Vandalizm

Dikkat: Bu maddenin Türkçe içeriği/çevirisi eksik, yetersiz ve dolayısıyla sorunludur

İngilizce özgün metinde olup Türkçede olmayan önemli hususlar olduğu için bu maddenin ivedilikle tam çevirisinin yapılmasında ve yetkili kişilerin bu madde kapsamında bir harekette bulunmadan önce İngilizce özgün metnin içeriğini tam hakkıyla bildiklerinden emin olmalarında yarar görüyorum.

Giriş bölümünden bir örnek: "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. For example, edit warring over how exactly to present encyclopedic content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, edits that are detrimental but well-intentioned, and edits that are vandalism. If it is clear that an editor is intending to improve Wikipedia, their edits are not vandalism, even if they violate some core policy of Wikipedia. Mislabeling good-faith edits "vandalism" can be harmful, as it makes users less likely to respond to corrective advice or to engage collaboratively during a disagreement. For that reason, avoid using the term "vandalism" unless it is clear the user means to harm Wikipedia; this is even true when warning a user with a standard warning template. Choose the template that most closely matches the behavior you are trying to correct."

Türkçede mevcut olmayan "How to respond to vandalism" bölümünden: "If you see that a user has added vandalism you may also check the user's other contributions (click "User contributions" on the left sidebar of the screen). If most or all of these are obvious vandalism you may report the user immediately at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, though even in this case you may consider issuing a warning first, unless there is an urgent need to block the user. Otherwise you can leave an appropriate warning message on the user's talk page." Veritas.vos.Liberabit.58 (mesaj) 09.07, 9 Mart 2020 (UTC)