BSD lisansları: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark
| [kontrol edilmemiş revizyon] | [kontrol edilmemiş revizyon] |
İçerik silindi İçerik eklendi
Değişiklik özeti yok |
kaynak düzeltildi |
||
2. satır:
:''For the BSD license template for use on Wikipedia, see [[Şablon:BSD]].''
{{Refimprove|
'''BSD lisansları''' izin veren [[özgür yazılım lisansları]] ailesidir. Lisans ilk kez aynı isimdeki bir [[Unix Benzeri]] işletim sistemi olan [[Berkeley Software Distribution]] (BSD) tarafından kullanıldı.
8. satır:
Lisansın iki farklı biçimi,
ilki Yeni BSD Lisansı/Değiştirilmiş BSD Lisansı<ref name="FSF-ModifiedBSD">{{cite web|url=http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#ModifiedBSD|başlık=Licenses - Free Software Foundation: Modified BSD license|yayımcı=Free Software Foundation|erişimtarihi=06 December 2009}}</ref>, ve ikincisi
Sadeleştirilmiş BSD Lisansı/FreeBSD Lisansı<ref name="FSF-FreeBSD">{{cite web|url=http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#FreeBSD|başlık=Licenses - Free Software Foundation: FreeBSD license|yayımcı=Free Software Foundation|erişimtarihi=06 December 2009}}</ref> [[Özgür Yazılım Vakfı]] tarafından [[GNU Genel Kamu Lisansı|GPL]]-[[lisans uyumluluğu|uyumlu]] [[özgür yazılım lisansı]] olarak kabul edilmiş, ve [[Open Source Initiative]] tarafından da [[açık kaynak lisansı]] olarak incelenmiş<ref name="osi">{{cite web|url=http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php|başlık=Open Source Initiative OSI - The BSD License:Licensing|yayımcı=Open Source Initiative|erişimtarihi=06 December 2009}}</ref> ve orijinal lisans FSF tarafından özgür yazılım lisansı olarak kabul edilmişse de GPL ile uyumlu olmadığı belirtilmiştir<ref name="FSF-OriginalBSD">{{cite web|url=http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#OriginalBSD|başlık=Licenses - Free Software Foundation: Original BSD license|yayımcı=Free Software Foundation|erişimtarihi=06 December 2009}}</ref>, açık kaynak lisansı olarak kabul edilmemiştir<ref name="osi"/>.
The licenses have fewer restrictions on distribution compared to other free software licenses such as the [[GNU General Public License]] or even the default restrictions provided by [[copyright]], putting works licensed under them relatively closer to the [[public domain]].
Satır 46 ⟶ 25:
| date = 1989
| OSI approved = No<ref name="osi"/>
| Debian approved = Yes<ref name="DFSG-licences">{{cite web|url=http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/|başlık=Debian -- License information|yayımcı=Debian|erişimtarihi=18 February 2010}}</ref>
| Free Software = Yes<ref name="FSF-OriginalBSD"/>
| GPL compatible = No<ref name="FSF-OriginalBSD"/>
Satır 57 ⟶ 31:
| linking = Yes
}}
The original BSD license contained a clause not found in later licenses, known as the "advertising clause". This clause eventually became controversial, as it required authors of all works deriving from a BSD-licensed work to include an acknowledgment of the original source in all advertising material. This was clause number 3 in the original license text:{{Citation needed|
<pre>
Satır 89 ⟶ 63:
</pre>
This clause was objected to on the grounds that as people changed the license to reflect their name or organization it led to escalating advertising requirements when programs were combined together in a software distribution—every occurrence of the license with a different name required a separate acknowledgment. In arguing against it, Richard Stallman has stated that he counted 75 such acknowledgments in a 1997 version of [[NetBSD]].<ref name="GNU">{{cite web|url=http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html|başlık=The BSD License Problem|author=Richard Stallman|yayımcı=Free Software Foundation|erişimtarihi=2006-11-15}}</ref>
In addition, the clause presented a legal problem for those wishing to publish BSD-licensed software which relies upon separate programs using the more-restrictive [[GNU General Public License|GNU GPL]]: the advertising clause is [[License compatibility|incompatible]] with the GPL, which does not allow the addition of restrictions beyond those it already imposes.
Satır 108 ⟶ 76:
| author = [[Regents of the University of California]]
| copyright = [[Public Domain]]
| date = {{dts|1999-07-22}}<ref name="update"/>
| OSI approved = Yes<ref name="osi"/>
| Debian approved = Yes<ref name="DFSG-licences"/>
Satır 122 ⟶ 84:
| linking = Yes
}}
The advertising clause was removed from the license text in the official BSD on
While the original license is sometimes referred to as "'''BSD-old'''", the resulting 3-clause version is sometimes referred to by "'''BSD-new'''." Other names include "New BSD", "revised BSD", "BSD-3", or "3-clause BSD." In fact, this version has been [[vetting|vetted]] as an Open source license by the OSI as the "'''New BSD License'''."<ref name="osi"/>
Satır 172 ⟶ 134:
}}
An even more simplified version has come into use, primarily known for its usage in [[FreeBSD]].<ref name="FreeBSD">{{cite web|url=http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html|
{{Clear}}
Satır 203 ⟶ 165:
</pre>
Other projects, such as [[NetBSD]], use a similar 2-clause license, but without the additional disclaimer.<ref name="NetBSD">{{cite web|url=http://www.netbsd.org/about/redistribution.html|başlık=NetBSD Licensing and Redistribution|yayımcı=The NetBSD Foundation|erişimtarihi=06 December 2009}}</ref> This version still constitutes the New BSD License, as the OSI has stated "Also, you may optionally omit clause 3 and still be OSD conformant."<ref name="osi"/>
== Proprietary software licenses compatibility ==
The BSD License allows proprietary use, and for the software released under the license to be incorporated into proprietary products. Works based on the material may be released under a proprietary license or as closed source software. This is the reason for widespread use of the BSD code in proprietary products, ranging from [[Juniper Networks]] routers to [[Mac OS X]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://developer.apple.com/opensource/index.html|başlık=Developer Connection — Open Source|yayımcı=Apple, Inc.|yıl=2007|erişimtarihi=2007-11-17
}}</ref>
| |||