Sol liberteryenizm: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

[kontrol edilmiş revizyon][kontrol edilmiş revizyon]
İçerik silindi İçerik eklendi
Khutuck Bot (mesaj | katkılar)
k Bot: Kaynak ve içerik düzenleme (hata bildir)
InternetArchiveBot (mesaj | katkılar)
3 kaynağı kurtardı ve 0 kaynağı ölü olarak işaretledi.) #IABot (v2.0.7
13. satır:
}}</ref> çağdaş teorisyenler tarafından savunulmaktadır.
 
Sol liberteryenizm veya liberteryen sol [[Roderick T. Long]] tarafından şöyle tarif edilmektedir: "geleneksel olarak solun kavramları olarak düşünülen kavramlarla liberteryenizmin birleşmesi, kaynaşması, yeniden bütünleşmesi. Bu, çalışanın güçlendirilmesi, [[plütokrasi]] için duyulan endişe, feminizm ve değişik toplumsal eşitlikçilik kavramlarını içermektedir."<ref>Long, Roderick. T. [http://en.liberalis.pl/2008/01/04/interview-with-roderick-long/ An Interview With Roderick Long] {{Webarşiv|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327050439/https://en.liberalis.pl/2008/01/04/interview-with-roderick-long/ |date=27 Mart 2020 }}</ref>
 
Sol liberteryenizm genellikle birbiriyle örtüşen üç ilişkili düşünce okulunu ifade etmede kullanılır: [[Geoliberteryenizm]], The Steiner-Vallentyne okulu <ref>Kymlicka, Will (2005). "libertarianism, left-". In Honderich, Ted. ''The Oxford Companion to Philosophy''. New York City: [[Oxford University Press]]. p. 516. ISBN 978-0199264797. "'Left-libertarianism' is a new term for an old conception of justice, dating back to Grotius. It combines the libertarian assumption that each person possesses a natural right of self-ownership over his person with the egalitarian premiss that natural resources should be shared equally. Right-wing libertarians argue that the right of self-ownership entails the right to appropriate unequal parts of the external world, such as unequal amounts of land. According to left-libertarians, however, the world's natural resources were initially unowned, or belonged equally to all, and it is illegitimate for anyone to claim exclusive private ownership of these resources to the detriment of others. Such private appropriation is legitimate only if everyone can appropriate an equal amount, or if those who appropriate more are taxed to compensate those who are thereby excluded from what was once common property. Historic proponents of this view include Thomas Paine, Herbert Spencer, and Henry George. Recent exponents include Philippe Van Parijs and Hillel Steiner."</ref> ve [[Sol piyasa anarşizmi]] <ref>Chartier, Gary. Johnson, Charles W. (2011). ''Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty''. Minor Compositions. pp. 1-11. ISBN 978-1570272424</ref>
21. satır:
 
== Dış bağlantılar ==
* [http://all-left.net/ Alliance of the Libertarian Left] {{Webarşiv|url=https://www.webcitation.org/6BpbWLD1w?url=http://praxeology.net/all-left.htm |date=31 Ekim 2012 }}
* [http://www.holisticpolitics.org HolisticPolitics.org]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20101028163000/http://flag.blackened.net/liberty/libertarians.html Prominent Anarchists and Left-Libertarians]