Ural-Altay dil ailesi: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark
[kontrol edilmiş revizyon] | [kontrol edilmiş revizyon] |
İçerik silindi İçerik eklendi
Değişiklik özeti yok |
|||
8. satır:
| ...
| aile5 = most specific sub-group of which this family is a part
| aile = Tartışmalı, genel çevrelerce kabul görmüyor.<ref name="Asya Pereltsvaig 2012, pp. 211-216">"...[T]his selection of features does not provide good evidence for common descent" and "we can observe convergence rather than divergence between Turkic and Mongolic languages--a pattern than is easily explainable by borrowing and diffusion rather than common descent", Asya Pereltsvaig, Languages of the World, An Introduction (2012, Cambridge) has a good discussion of the Altaic hypothesis (pp. 211-216).</ref>
| alt grup1 = [[Ural dilleri]], [[Altay dilleri]]
| alt grup2 =
17. satır:
| harita_açıklama = Ural-Altay dillerinin dağılımı
| iso2 =
| iso5 =
}}
'''Ural Altay Dil Ailesi''' ('''Turanca''''<ref>{{
Zaman içerisinde teoriye olan destek azalmış ve [[Altay dilleri]]nin birbirleriyle akraba olmadığı, [[Türkçe]] ve [[Moğolca]] gibi [[Altay]] dil ailesinde sınıflandırılmış dillerin arasındaki tipolojik benzerliklerin aynı atadan gelmelerinden değil, yoğun ödünçlemeler ve uzun temaslar sonucu oluştuğu dilbilimciler tarafından kabul edilen genel görüş olmuştur.<ref name="Asya Pereltsvaig 2012, pp. 211-216">"...[T]his selection of features does not provide good evidence for common descent" and "we can observe convergence rather than divergence between Turkic and Mongolic languages--a pattern than is easily explainable by borrowing and diffusion rather than common descent", Asya Pereltsvaig, Languages of the World, An Introduction (2012, Cambridge) has a good discussion of the Altaic hypothesis (pp. 211-216).</ref><ref>"While 'Altaic' is repeated in encyclopedias and handbooks most specialists in these languages no longer believe that the three traditional supposed Altaic groups, Turkic, Mongolian and Tungusic, are related." Lyle Campbell & Mauricio J. Mixco, A Glossary of Historical Linguistics (2007, University of Utah Press), pg. 7.</ref><ref>"When cognates proved not to be valid, Altaic was abandoned, and the received view now is that Turkic, Mongolian, and Tungusic are unrelated." Johanna Nichols, Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time (1992, Chicago), pg. 4.</ref><ref>"Careful examination indicates that the established families, Turkic, Mongolian, and Tungusic, form a linguistic area (called Altaic)...Sufficient criteria have not been given that would justify talking of a genetic relationship here." R.M.W. Dixon, The Rise and Fall of Languages (1997, Cambridge), pg. 32
[[Güneş dil teorisi]] gibi günümüzde kabul görmeyen<ref>[https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/dspace/bitstream/1887/2504/1/350_001.pdf ''La théorie du langage-soleil et sa place dans la réforme de la langue turque'' (''Güneş Dil Kuramı ve Türk dil reformundaki yeri''),] [[Erik-Jan Zürcher]]<span>, s. 87, erişim tarihi 1 Aralık 2007</span>{{fr}}<br>
|