Zoraki Kral: Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

Filme, Logue'un Kral'ın stresini azaltması için kaba konuşarak bağırmasına teşvik etmesinden dolayı ilkin [[British Board of Film Classification]] tarafından Birleşik Krallık'taki gösterim için "15 yaş altı için sakıncalı" derecesi verildi. Londra Film Festivali'nde Hooper kararı eleştirdi, kötü dil için grubun filme nasıl "15" verdiğini fakat grafik işkence sahnelerine rağmen "12A" alan ''[[Salt (film)|Salt]]'' (2010) ile ''[[Casino Royale (film, 2006)|Casino Royale]]'' gibi filmlere izin verildiğini sorguladı. Hooper'ın eleştirisini takiben film derecelendirilmesi "12A" (12 yaş ve altı için sakıncalı olabilir) olarak düşürülerek 12 yaş altındaki çocukların aileleriyle filmi izleyebilmeleri sağlandı.<ref>"[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-11598140 Colin Firth welcomes censors' reclassification decision]". BBC News website. 22 Ekim 2010. Retrieved on 23 Ekim 2010 ([http://www.webcitation.org/5vSbMv18k archived] on 3 January 2011).</ref><ref>"[http://www.bbfc.co.uk/AFF274065 The King's Speech]". British Board of Film Classification. Retrieved on 23 Ekim 2010 ([http://www.webcitation.org/5vSbQ3B6b archived] by WebCite on 3 January 2011).</ref> <!-- Hooper levelled the same criticism at the [[Motion Picture Association of America]], which gave the film an R rating, preventing anyone under the age of 17 from seeing the film without an adult.<ref>Goldstein, Patrick (1 Kasım 2010). "[http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/the_big_picture/2010/11/the-mpaa-cracks-down-on-bad-language-in-the-kings-speech.html To the MPAA ratings board, 'The King's Speech' is just as bad as 'Saw 3D']". The Big Picture (Tribune Company). Retrieved on 7 Kasım 2010 ([http://www.webcitation.org/5vSbSx0Pg archived] by WebCite on 3 January 2011).</ref> This rating was not appealed.<ref>{{Web kaynağı | url = http://www.vancouversun.com/news/King+Speech+slapped+with+ratings+agency/3838795/story.html | başlık = The King's Speech slapped with an 'R' by U.S. ratings agency | erişimtarihi = 30 January 2011 | yayımcı = Vancouversun.com | tarih = 16 Kasım 2010 | arşivurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20110303035537/http://www.vancouversun.com:80/news/King+Speech+slapped+with+ratings+agency/3838795/story.html | arşivtarihi = 3 Mart 2011}}</ref> In his review, Roger Ebert criticised the R rating, calling it "utterly inexplicable", and said, "This is an excellent film for teenagers".<ref name='Ebert'>{{Web kaynağı | url = http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101215/REVIEWS/101219985/1023 | başlık = The King's Speech :: rogerebert.com :: Reviews | erişimtarihi = 30 January 2011 | yayımcı = Rogerebert.suntimes.com | arşivurl = http://web.archive.org/web/20130310175751/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101215/REVIEWS/101219985/1023 | arşivtarihi = 10 Mart 2013}}</ref> In January 2011, Harvey Weinstein, the producer, said he was considering having the film re-edited to remove some profanity, so that it would receive a lower classification and reach a larger audience.<ref>Child, B.[http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/jan/26/kings-speech-swearing-weinstein-oscars King's Speech re-edit could cut swearing] The Guardian, 26 January 2011. Retrieved 2 Şubat 2011</ref> Tom Hooper, however, refused to cut the film, though he considered covering the swear words with bleeps. [[Helena Bonham Carter]] also defended the film, saying, "[The film] is not violent. It’s full of humanity and wit. [It's] for people not with just a speech impediment, but who have got confidence [doubts]."<ref>Labrecque, J. [http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/01/31/tom-hooper-pg13-kings-speech/ Tom Hooper on PG-13 'King's Speech': 'I wouldn't support cutting the film in any way' -- EXCLUSIVE] ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'', 31 January 2011. Retrieved 5 Şubat 2011. </ref>

 

{{-}}