Anarşi (1135-1153): Revizyonlar arasındaki fark

[kontrol edilmiş revizyon][kontrol edilmiş revizyon]
İçerik silindi İçerik eklendi
Ertly (mesaj | katkılar)
Ertly (mesaj | katkılar)
168. satır:
 
==Geleneği==
===Tarihçiler tarafından ele alınması===
 
 
<!--
Historiography
A photograph of the first page of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle
The first page of the Peterborough element of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, written around 1150, which details the events of the civil war
 
Much of the modern history of the civil war of the Anarchy is based on accounts of chroniclers who lived in, or close to, the middle of the 12th century, forming a relatively rich account of the period.[240] All of the main chronicler accounts carry significant regional biases in how they portray the disparate events. Several of the key chronicles were written in the south-west of England, including the Gesta Stephani, or "Acts of Stephen", and William of Malmesbury's Historia Novella, or "New History".[241] In Normandy, Orderic Vitalis wrote his Ecclesiastical History, covering the period until 1141, and Robert of Torigni wrote a later history of the rest of the later years.[241] Henry of Huntingdon, who lived in the east of England, produced the Historia Anglorum that provides a regional account of the conflict.[242] The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle was past its prime by the time of the war, but is remembered for its striking account of conditions during the Anarchy, in particular its description that "men said openly that Christ and his saints were asleep".[243] Most of the chronicles carry some bias for or against the key political figures in the conflict.[244]
 
The use of the term "the Anarchy" to describe the civil war has been subject to much critical discussion. The phrase itself originates in the late-Victorian period. Many historians of the time traced a progressive and universalist course of political and economic development in England over the medieval period.[245] William Stubbs, following in this "Whiggish" tradition, analysed the political aspects of the period in his 1874 volume the Constitutional History of England. This work highlighted an apparent break in the development of the English constitution in the 1140s, and caused his student John Round to coin the term "the Anarchy" to describe the period.[246] Later historians critiqued the term, however, as analysis of the financial records and other documents from the period suggested that the actual breakdown in law and order during the conflict had been more nuanced and localised than chronicler accounts alone might have suggested.[247] Further work in the 1990s reinterpreted Henry's efforts in the post-war reconstruction period, suggesting for a greater level of continuity with Stephen's wartime government than had previously been supposed.[248] The label of "the Anarchy" remains in use by modern historians, but rarely without qualification.[249]
-->
 
===Popüler kültürdeki yeri===
<!--
Popular representations
Main article: Cultural depictions of the Anarchy